Global Issues Document (w/ questions & annotations)
What did you find easy about this task? What did you do well?
I found it quite easy to find extracts from both texts that were in relation to my global issue. I think I did well with the overall larger ideas. I was able to formulate my thoughts and support my ideas through both the texts.
What did you find challenging about this task?
The most challenging part for me in this task was to dig deeper, I know I answered the questions asked but I don’t think I went into as much depth as I should be aiming for. This is something I need to work on overall in this class, my analysing skills aren’t bad but I think they could use some improvement in terms “how” or “why” a text might have a certain feature.
What do you need to practice more in order to overcome this challenge(s)?
To overcome this challenge, I need to focus on looking at the smaller details and really unpack every idea I think of. I honestly don’t know what practical steps I can take to reach this point but I think reading more texts and trying to really focus in on the “how” or the impact a text may have might help.
What are some new perspectives you gained after your close study of the extracts?
After studying Monbiot’s “Embarrassment of Riches”, I was quite intrigued to read about the psychological impacts of being rich and how that takes away people’s empathy. I am not a very money-driven person to begin with but reading that essay opened my eyes and actually see that having a lot of money and being wealthy means people can afford things doesn’t mean its the best for rich people either because it takes away their emotional connection with other people. We all always think about how the rich being rich affects the poor, but the essay shows how wealth is bad not only for the poor and the environment but also bad for the rich themselves.
In what ways is the kind of knowledge we gain from the study of language and literature different from the kind we gain through the study of other disciplines?
I believe the subject of language and literature is one that is very subjective. Unlike sciences and mathematics, there isn’t one right answer and a specific or ‘correct’ way of doing things. The knowledge we gain in language and literature is more about context and communication. Using context, we can study the effect or impact of a piece of writing. But its also a subject where a person\’s identity influences what impact it has which one against shows that its a subjective subject. It is about how we communicate using words and how that has changed over time.
Connections to TOK:
In TOK, we focus a lot of what we know and how we know what we know. With language and literature, a lot of it has to do with our identities, what we take away from a subject like this (not taking into consideration the technical things like grammar) depends a lot of who we were, our values and cultures and etc. So how we know what we know is a difficult question to answer because it will differ depending on who is asked. In TOK, we have also looked at bias and perspective and I think that while studying language and literature, it is so important to distinguish our perspective from the author and characters\’ perspectives. One’s experiences and backgrounds can really impact how they understand a text and it might differ from the author\’s initial intent. This is quite similar to TOK in the sense that TOK follows the same idea but focusing on what knowledge is and how it is gained rather than actually focusing on specific content. Perspective is a common concept discussed in both L&L and TOK.
Connections to CAS:
The main connection I can see between Monbiot\’s essays and CAS is the idea of advocacy. Monbiot\’s is an environmental and political activist so naturally, advocacy is something quite common in his writing. His opinions and ideas show that there is change that is necessary in different areas and many times he even goes on to give a \’solution\’ to the issue he mentions.